(1) According to Rule 29, if both parties to the dispute agree to resolve the dispute through conciliation, the organization or local body responsible for conciliation shall require the parties to appoint a maximum of three conciliators from the list of conciliators prepared by that organization or local body.
(2) Notwithstanding anything written in sub-rule (1), the parties may appoint a conciliator in accordance with such regulations or procedures, if the organization or local body that conducts conciliation-related work has provided separate regulations or procedures regarding the appointment of a conciliator.
(3) If the parties request the organization or local body to appoint a conciliator, the organization or local body shall appoint a suitable person as a conciliator after considering the nature of the dispute and the matter to be reconciled, the qualification, efficiency and impartiality of the person who will be the conciliator. .
(4) If a conciliator does not work honestly or if it is found that a conciliator has the condition mentioned in Section 13 of the Act, the concerned party, organization or local body that performs work related to conciliation may remove such conciliator at any time.
(5) If the conciliator appointed in accordance with sub-rule (1) or (2) refuses to act as a conciliator, is unable to act, resigns, dies or the conciliator is removed in accordance with sub-rule (4) or if the position of the conciliator becomes vacant for any other reason, which A conciliator has been appointed through the process, and other people will be appointed as a conciliator through the same process.
(6) Other provisions related to the appointment of conciliators shall be as per sub-rules (6) and (7) of rule 18.